Gavel Exec reviews, redlines and drafts contracts for legal teams in Microsoft Word and online, using playbooks and market benchmarks. Free trial of 25 queries per user; $160 per user per month afterwards.
Gavel Exec is the contract review product of Gavel, the trading name of Documate, Inc. Gavel also sells a separate document automation product called Gavel Workflows, and its site says Gavel has been acquired by Relativity. Gavel Exec is aimed at lawyers and legal teams who review and negotiate commercial agreements.
It works inside Microsoft Word and in a browser. It produces a first-pass review that applies your standards and flags key issues, then creates suggested redlines and negotiation-ready comments directly in the document. It can draft new clauses or rewrite existing ones to match preferred fallback positions, run built-in or custom playbooks so positions stay consistent across matters, and compare clause wording with market data to point out off-market terms.
Each user starts with 25 free queries in a shared workspace during the trial, and no credit card is required. The paid plan is $160 per month per user, or $1,740 per user per year, and includes 1,000 completions a month. The site says team pricing exists for ten or more seats. The pricing page also shows Gavel Workflows prices, which are a different product.
On security, the vendor says Gavel Exec is SOC 2 Type II certified and that a zero data retention policy is contractually enforced. Detailed security and privacy documents are available on request through a demo.
AI contract review is a first pass. Output can be incomplete or wrong, so a qualified lawyer should check any contract with real legal or financial consequences. This page does not give legal advice.
Yes. Each user gets 25 free queries and a shared workspace during the trial, with no credit card required. There is no permanent free plan.
$160 per user per month, or $1,740 per user billed annually, with 1,000 completions per month on paid plans. Team pricing is available for ten or more seats.
Lawyers and legal teams that review contracts in Word. It is not a consumer tool, and its output is a first pass that a lawyer should check.
Website: https://www.gavel.io/
Company: Documate, Inc. d/b/a Gavel
Word-based AI contract review and redlining for legal teams, with playbooks and market benchmarks. Trial gives 25 queries per user, then $160 per user per month. Aimed at lawyers; output needs checking.
| Pricing model | Paid |
|---|---|
| Free tier | No free plan |
| Starting price | $160 / month |
| Data residency | Not verified |
| Compliance (as stated by vendor) | SOC 2 Type II (claimed) |
| Integrations | Not verified |
| Public API | Not verified |
| Self-hostable | Not verified |
| Official site | Not verified |
| Can a general AI assistant replace it? | A general chatbot can summarise a clause. Gavel Exec adds Word redlines, playbooks and market comparisons. It still needs a lawyer's review. |
| Last verified | 2026-10-10 by editor |
Juro is a contract workflow platform with AI review, drafting and data extraction, plus templates, approvals, e-signature and integrations. Pricing is custom after a questionnaire and demo; no free plan is listed.
LegalOn reviews contracts against playbooks, redlines in Word and web, and adds drafting, matter intake and a contract repository for in-house legal teams. Pricing is by demo; no free plan is listed.
Spellbook is an AI suite for law firms and in-house teams that reviews, drafts and benchmarks contracts in a Microsoft Word add-in and runs a multi-document agent. Pricing is by quote; a 7-day free trial is offered.
ContractKen is a Microsoft Word add-in for lawyers that reviews and redlines contracts against playbooks and drafts from precedents. It costs $119 per user per month, with a 14-day guided free trial.
Genie AI is a contract assistant that drafts, reviews, redlines and negotiates agreements, with a Word and Excel add-in. A free account has limited AI tokens and locks exports; Pro is $75 a month billed monthly.
AI presentation generator for PowerPoint
Need the outcome rather than the software?